Quantcast

Is Your Rubberband About To Snap?


25 August 09 04:29 PM
Everyone’s plate is overloaded these days with federal, state, and district mandates, as well as opening our schools for the beginning of the school year.  Some days we feel as if our rubber band can’t be stretched anymore before it breaks sending all of our best-laid plans sailing across the room and in a million different directions.
Interwoven into our day-to-day work-related stresses are stresses due to relationships, families, and our personal financial obligations.  As educators and professional developers, we test the tenacity of our rubber bands constantly.  How much more stress can we add to our daily lives before that rubber band begins to break?
The term stress originally was coined to describe architectural leverages to illustrate load-bearing properties in steel rods.  How ironic that over time a construction term would morph into a term to define how people feel about their work and family responsibilities.
When our rubber band snaps, what do we do?  We usually take the two ends of the rubber band and tie them back together.  The rubber band may not look the same or be as flexible, but it still works.  How often has your rubber band broken?  After a while a rubber band stiffens and becomes inflexible…beyond repair.  So, how do we handle stress?

Postedby droberts | 4 Comments    

Making The Grade: College Preparedness


07 July 09 11:23 AM
Grad Rates
iWebPhoto.com - Free Photo Upload, Free Image Hosting, Free Flash Slideshows
Click Photo to View
iWebPhoto.com

The Washington Post recently published a list of the 1,500 Top Public High Schools in the nation based on their ability to prepare children for college.  The ranking system includes variables such as the number of Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate, and/or Cambridge exams taken by all students in the school for 2008 versus the number of graduating seniors for the year.  Twenty-two Florida schools made it to the Top 100.  Unfortunately, none of Broward County’s public or charter high schools made it to the Top 100 list using these variables.   These results stand in stark contrast to the grading results from the Florida Comprehensive Achievement Test (FCAT) in which some high schools have been given a false sense of accomplishment.

Controversy swirls around the topics of testing and assessments and the dissenting voices from the Washington Post ranking system distract us from the underlying issue:  How well are we preparing all students for the future?  

“Tests will always be in the mix, and they should be.  But they should not be the only way we gauge students’ progress, “ states Tom Vander Ark, Executive Director of Education for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.  In a round table discussion he participated in for the Stanford Social Innovation Review, Vander Ark indicates that high schools have to be restructured for a higher purpose:  

“When a superintendent goes out and says, “We want to raise test scores,” that’s good and it’s interesting.  If, however, you can connect with the community by saying, “It’s our goal to make sure that every kid leaves our system with great life options in continuing their learning, in work, and as engaged citizens,” that’s a higher purpose. “

The national challenge to changing the purpose of high schools is that there are no metrics around kids ready for college, work, and citizenship, so we need to invent some of these metrics.  Vander Ark further adds, “We think the national graduation rate is about 70 percent, but we’ve been lying to each other for decades about the real number.  The real number of kids that leave high school ready for college is about a third, about 32 percent.  You can cut both of these numbers in half if we are talking about low income kids of color.”  

Many school districts across the country have improved elementary education by developing standards-based curriculum, embedded assessments, and aligned school-based professional development.  However, the multiple tracks and hundreds of courses offered at the secondary level make it a far more cumbersome task to create an aligned system.

The state of Florida has made great strides in it's effort to support districts in aligning their support systems and has been recognized for it's growing use of longitudinal data that ties together K-12, postsecondary, and workforce information into a Data Warehouse (DW).  The DW Performance on Common Placement Tests report  also shows students how well they fared on college placement tests, percentages of graduates entering college with advanced credits and also indicates students in need of remediation.  The Data Warehouse is a tool principals can use to improve college preparedness.  School leaders (principals and teachers) need strong support in order to create a more cohesive system for high schools to move beyond using the state's data warehouse as a compliance tool and to view it more as resource for teachers and students.

 Where does professional development enter into the equation? We have underestimated the amount of time it takes for a leader to craft a process that creates meaning and commitment.  School change is not about plans, patterns, and processes.  It’s about people.  How they react, disengage, and reengage with change (Evans 2001).   That doesn’t happen using leadership models from the 1980’s and 1990’s.  According to Peter Gronn of the University of Cambridge in London, “we have to move beyond the ‘lingering culture of heroism’ where the school principal or district leader feels pressured to live up to grossly inflated expectations.”   Why should school leaders go through the trouble of building capacity within a faculty?  You can only answer this question.  In closing, I would like to share a poem that was presented to me when I began my journey to build capacity in others:

“Who’s to Blame”
The college professor said: “Such rawness in a student is a shame; lack of preparation in high school is to blame.”
Said the high school teacher: “Good heavens! That boy’s a fool.  The fault, of course, is with the middle school.”
The middle school teacher said: “From stupidity may I be spared.  They sent him in so unprepared.”
The primary teacher huffed: “Kindergarten blockheads all.  They call that preparation?  Why, it’s worse than none at all.”
The Kindergarten teacher said: “Such lack of training never did I see.  What Kind of woman must that mother be.”
The mother said: “Poor helpless child.  He’s not to blame.  His father’s people were all the same.”
Said the father at the end of the line: “I doubt the rascal’s even mine.”

 We, as leaders, have to cultivate a sense of ownership of the process we task classroom teachers to do for the classroom teacher is the change agent within a school.  How well are we preparing all students for the future?  How do you know whether or not teachers are implementing your vision?  It’s more than applying a slew of one-shot workshops strung together throughout the year and expecting the vision for our schools to be implemented.  It’s about evaluating the school's engagement with the process.    What would engagement assessments look like for students and teachers?  What accountability measures need to be addressed to reach this goal?  What should be your next steps?

FYI -

  Newsweek  has showcased a few of these top high schools on their website.  
    


    

Entertaining The Elephant – Merit Pay


25 June 09 07:48 AM

Whichever side of the diving board you're standing on pay for performance initiatives are poised to make a huge splash in school reform.  Several federally funded grants focusing on performance pay give insight into how school districts and teachers can work together to implement ongoing programs to improve teaching and learning.
 
The Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF), a $196 million grant fueled by the 2006 Appropriations Committee (Podgursky &Springer 2007), is shedding light on the challenges grantees are running into with these funds.  Matthew Springer, Director of the National Center on Performance Incentives at Vanderbilt University indicates that the data they are collecting from the 34 TIF grantees, which includes both charter and traditional public schools, will form the blueprint for implementing pay for performance on a larger scale in the future (Sawchuk 2009).  This gets me thinking about how different districts have implemented the TIF grant and the preliminary data collected thus far.

Hillsborough County Schools, which serves 177,000 students, spent the majority of their first year on professional development for the teachers and principals involved in the grant.  The focus is for all stakeholders to understand that it is about mastering the performance standards tied to bonuses.  According to Rob Weil, Deputy Director of Educational Issues for the American Federation of Teachers, “This is key.  Several school systems build merit pay around recognition, but 18 months from now if you ask a teacher who received the bonus to show you what they did to improve student learning, she’ll say, “I haven’t a clue.”  System improvement is stalled at that point conveyed Weil (Sawchuk 2009).

Hillsborough’s program is built on 12 courses open to the faculty and administration of participating TIF grant schools.  Educators learn how to analyze data and move through the courses until they are operating within Professional Learning Communities

Charting rough seas often brings mid course corrections and this was crucial to TIF grantee Houston Public Schools.  The school district, which serves 200,000 students, received $12 million in TIF funds.  Unlike Hillsborough County, Houston focused a majority of the performance pay to student achievement data for participating teachers.  
After the first payout in January 2007, principals saw that some of their most effective teachers did not receive a bonus.  “This was a big deal,” stated Stevens, Assistant Superintendent for Research and Accountability for Houston Public Schools (Sawchuk 2009). Teacher backlash to the performance pay system resulted in a mid course correction of the process.

Houston now uses a value-added system by SAS-EVAAS that uses a combination of school level, grade level, and subject level data along with components of the school improvement process. 

The Houston performance pay model corroborates the principal-agent theory.  This theory implies that a merit pay program designed by the principal (district) will not encompass the relevant parts of the organization’s mission and, as a result, may lead to agents(teachers) placing too much emphasis on an aspect of the contract at the detriment of excluded members (Podgursky & Springer 2007).

The debate continues regarding the complexity of instituting merit pay.  An article from Chester Finn of Stanford University published in the Wall Street Journal makes a case for performance pay based on a policy correction in which districts should decrease the number of teachers hired in the future in order to increase the number of stronger candidates who are paid substantially more for their knowledge and abilities.

 First, educators want to teach fewer students.  We need differentiated instruction, yet the ultimate goal of every child mastering the performance standards set by the state may never be reached using this model.  This makes a visually appealing image of schools that are meeting the needs of all children even though their is scant evidence that smaller classes significantly improve student achievement.  Second, increasing the number of teachers also increases the number dues paying membership and influence unions have in public education.   Third, increasing the number of educators also increases enrollment and revenues for college/university schools of education. 

Finn argues that teachers are different and based on what they are teaching should be paid differently.  For instance, Even though physical education teachers and Chemistry teachers are paid the same, they require different levels of skills.  Are Chemistry teachers easily replaceable?  Calculus teachers?  How do you attract the best and the brightest into the a profession when there are other professions that pay substantially more?  Across the board raises of $10,000 to 3 million plus educators is a dream according to Finn.

Finn adds, "Instead of realizing that 20 somethings hop from job to job until they decide what they really want to do with their lives, we say that teaching is a lifelong profession."  He goes on to add that we must correct policy errors by employing different rules that reward effectiveness, deploy incentives, fund applicable technology, compensate teachers sensibly and make more skillful use of "short termers" instead of dreaming that new educators would stay longer.  According to Finn, we have to watch what we are doing this time. 

Where do you stand in the debate over performance pay?


References
Sawchuk, S. (2009) Federal Performance Pay Program Finding Its Footing.  Education Week. Retrieved on June 23, 2009 from Ebscohost database.
Podgursky, M. & Springer, M. (2007) Credentials Versus Performance: Review of the Teacher Performance Pay Research. Peabody Journal of Education. Retrieved on June 23, 2009 from Ebscohost database.


Postedby droberts | 4 Comments    
Filed under:

,

Extending The Boundaries of Collective Bargaining


24 June 09 09:04 AM
"All of these factors impact the classroom indirectly, but I think everyone would agree that it would be harder to make any gains in the classroom if teacher’s bills were hopelessly behind and food was scarce in their home.  I like the Hawley statement that you quoted because I’ve been to some lame workshops, but I also think that administrators are untrained in the art of in-service.  I can state from personal experience that there are times when teachers need backing and support.  I was the victim of a student accusation that I was looking at gay *** during class time on my school computer.  Without my union representation, I might have been fired on the spot.  The union president insisted on seeing the suspect images, and it was discovered that I visited a website selling a trip to Jamaica with people on the beach.  I was researching a travel brochure creation unit that I was planning, and thanks to my union, nothing came of the false accusation.  I definitely think the topic warrants further exploration, and I wish you luck in your research.   Jim"

 While teachers value collective bargaining for its traditional protections, sizeable numbers also seem open to the union as a player in reform as evidenced in my colleague Jim's email response to the previous post.   An Education Sector survey conducted in 2008 sheds light on the nuances and variations in public teacher perspectives when it comes to collective bargaining agreements and the results indicate that there are no clear cut winners when it comes to the public opinion of public educators (Duffett, Farkas, Rotherman & Silva 2008). 

When given an opportunity to speak specifically to their needs, over half (52%) of the teachers surveyed indicated that they preferred the union to take care of the traditional protections of benefits, salary, and employment.  Yet nearly a third (32%) indicated unions should increase their emphasis on teacher quality and student achievement (Duffett, Farkas, Rotherman & Silva 2008).

    Both the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers offer research-based professional development programs that model the planning, delivery, follow-up and evaluation of instructional practices (Maciejewski 2007).
    An example of a local teachers union that developed curricula and instructional programs jointly with there local school system is the Toledo Federation of Teachers (TFT).  The TFT developed a  summer Reading Academy program in 2000 incorporating the AFT’s research-based professional development program  (Maciejewski 2007).  In 2004, the Toledo district’s test scores improved enough to take the district off of the “academic emergency” status it once held.

    “I just think that there are other things that are more true to my feelings or my concerns …If they were involved with (teacher quality/student achievement), I mean honestly, I would still probably have my focus or my concerns with my salary, the work day, those kinds of things,” said a Phoenix teacher from a focus group (Duffett, Farkas, Rotherman & Silva 2008).

Education Sector is continuing the discussion about Teacher Unions and Professional Work July 1st through July 2nd.  What are your thoughts on the issue?  Should teacher unions play more of a role in teacher professional development? 

Postedby droberts | 1 Comments    

Is Collective Bargaining Hurting Student Achievement?


23 June 09 03:53 PM

In the current atmosphere of accountability, teacher unions have come under attack on several fronts from tenure to procedures for removing teachers from positions.  Since teachers are evaluated on the performance of their students, I wondered if there was any research available substantiating whether or not it made any difference if the teacher teaching in the classroom was a member of a union. 

Classroom teachers may feel the need for job security and advocate to increase their wages, and the Broward Teachers Union (BTU) has served as an advocate for these efforts.  Today, unions represent more than half of the 3 million active public elementary and secondary educators (Eberts 2007).  From a professional development perspective, collective bargaining units offer procedures for allotted professional development time and planning time for educators, yet fall short when it comes to including time for active learning strategies that allow time for teachers to augment their learning (Hammond & Richardson 2009). How does the negotiated contract affect transfer of knowledge from teacher learning and into the classroom to improve student achievement?

 Unfortunately, the lack of substantial research on the subject of collective bargaining and student achievement is disheartening.  The results from national studies of collective bargaining members on student achievement yielded minimal yet beneficial results for most students (Carini 2002).

 A review of preliminary research (Kurth 1987) (Nelson & Gould 2005) (Eberts 2007)(Carini 2008) shows that teacher unions have a standardizing affect on student achievement.  Average students excel within the parameters set by the collective bargaining agreement while low achieving and high achieving (gifted) students fall through the cracks. Taking a closer look at studies using the National Educational Longitudinal Survey, specific controls were used for both the student and the school.  Controls included analyzing data from the eighth and tenth grades and identifying whether or not the teacher delivering the exam was a part of a collective bargaining unit within the school or not.  The education of the instructor, and the length of time the instructor had been working at the school were also taken into consideration(Carini 2007). What is significant is that students where the teacher was a part of a collective bargaining unit within the school had a marked increase of between 1 and 2 percent on the National Educational Longitudinal Survey results (Carini 2007).  

Another study adding weight to the argument that collective bargaining has a standardizing affect on student achievement is research focusing on a alternate indicator of student achievement: high school dropout rates (Hoxby 1996). The findings suggest that high schools with high numbers of teachers as a part of the collective bargaining unit reduces student achievement and increases dropout rates by 2.3 percent.  When analyzing the results from Carini and Hoxby there is a direct correlation between the number of low achieving students whose needs are not addressed and the increase in dropout rates at the high school level. 

These findings that identify the correlation between union schools and districts and an upsurge in average students' achievement directly tie into new research on teacher learning which shows that “drive-by workshop training within schools does not enhance teacher performance and may hinder teacher development which in turn hinders student
achievement (Hawley&Valli 1999).

The research showing a direct link between student achievement and teacher unions is inconclusive at this moment (Carini 2007).  However, this data does show the need for collective bargaining  to include language in the contract for more transfer of teacher learning into the classroom to improve student achievement.


Postedby droberts | 2 Comments    

Education Stimulus Loophole - Impact Aid


22 March 09 07:18 PM

  The Education Stimulus package falls under the comparability and compliance provisions in Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Act.  Within these provisions is a little known loophole under Title VIII called Impact Aid.  Impact Aid, a little known Cold War provision, allows for school districts to use large sums of funding without strings attached and in whatever form the district deems necessary.   This includes items that were thought to be off limits such as school construction.  Originally, Impact Aid was put in place to offset the impact of military bases and the federal presence on Native American land since districts are responsible for educating children on reservations, but cannot tax the property on these lands.  The language in Impact Aid is to offset the negative impact providing educational services would have under these circumstances during times of war.  How ironic that districts will be able to use part of the $48 billion in aid to not only repair schools that are in need of updating, but will also be able to build new construction due to a back door loophole is an unforeseen benefit. 

 

The ability to use stabilization funds for Impact Aid means there is greater flexibility for use of these funds than previously acknowledged. 

 

“Under Impact Aid, districts can use the funds for anything within a district – anything,” said Leigh Manasevit, an attorney with the education law firm Brunstein & Manasevit.  “That means hiring teachers, paying for basic educational services, building a new school…If we were to proceed under this analysis, then everything  the (stimulus) law says about stabilization dollars at school districts goes out the window because you would need to use the funds according to Title I, IDEA(the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) or voc-ed.  You could spend them as if they were general revenue.”

 

The Department of Education is expected to address the issue of Impact Aid this week.  Any way you look at it, the feds need a lot of flexibility in order to do the type of reform that needs to be done in public education. 

Postedby droberts | 1 Comments    

Malcolm Gladwell: What We Can Learn From Spaghetti Sauce


13 February 09 07:40 PM

This is an interesting TED Talk from 2006.  What lessons can we glean from spaghetti sauce? 

http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/malcolm_gladwell_on_spaghetti_sauce.html

Speakers Bureau request – SAC Meeting, January 28, 2009


10 February 09 12:14 PM
December 16, 2008, email request:

Many of our teachers are very experienced here and some are less experienced but adventurous.  We would like to have someone talk about professional development options that would satisfy both groups.  

Also we would like to hear about options that would encourage successful professional development programs within our school.  All these areas we currently have in place however, we would like to get fresh perspectives.

Professional Developer response:
 

I would gladly speak to your SAC committee in January about professional development options. To ensure that I am prepared with materials that would be most effective would you please elaborate on the following questions about your school’s current professional learning model? Thank you.

How often do your teachers meet for professional development during the week? Month?
How long is each session?
What were the professional development offerings presented over the past semester?
How many of the sessions were ongoing over a period of more than one month?
How do you know whether or not the strategies are working? What tools are you currently using?
What Adequate Yearly Progress subgroups have been identified in your School Improvement Plan?
What is the percentage of new teachers at your campus?
What is the percentage of veteran (5+ years) teachers at your campus?

Once I have a clearer picture of the professional learning culture of your school, I will be able to offer suggestions tailored to meet your needs.


January 16, 2009, school response:

How often do your teachers meet for professional development during the week?  Month?
Teachers meet 2 x per month as a group for staff development and faculty or grade level meetings; 4 x per month for collaboration by department; planning/early release days as available.

How long is each session?
Sessions are 1 hour long; early release or planning days time may vary

What were the professional development offerings presented over the past semester?
Reading in the content area and ELL/ ESE presentations for whole group; department collaboration decided by department

How many of the sessions were ongoing over a period of more than one month?
All of these staff development opportunities have been since start of year.

How do you know whether or not they are working?  What tools are you currently using?
Collaboration information is through group discussion by departments (smaller groups.)
Admin. and reading coach walk throughs help to observe classroom application of strategies.

What Adequate Yearly Progress subgroups have been identified in your School Improvement Plan?
Blacks, Economically Disadvantaged, English Language Learners and Students with Disabilities have been identified based on our last FCAT results.  We had always made AYP prior to last year.  

What is the percentage of new teachers at your campus?
10.9% new teacher at our school.

What is the percentage of veteran (5+ years) teachers at your campus?
74% veterans at our campus.

Research (DuFour, 1991; Loucks-Horsley &Hergert, 1985; Showers et al., 1987) has shown that although most teachers understand the concepts being presented in a meaningful workshop, they seldom change behavior from the workshop alone.  The changes come from job-embedded follow-up and support.   How will I get this point across to a group of teachers, administrators and parents at an after school meeting?  

SAC Committee meeting, January 28, 2009:
Using an NSDC bookmark as a discussion starter, we delved into how the teachers at the school were using their time together and over the course of the discussion we discovered a huge untapped resource.  With veteran teachers making up more than 70% of the faculty,  teachers had an opportunity to share their knowledge with each other as Teacher Researchers.  

We also discovered that they already had resources for another professional development strategy:  Curriculum Design as Professional Development.  The Science Department Chairperson informed the group that they had tailored their curriculum and instructional focus calendar to fit their needs and were more than willing to assist other departments to do the same. 

Overall, it was a great brainstorming session for planning professional development for the 2009-2010 school year.  By planning professional learning now, the school is giving themselves a great gift.  T-I-M-E.  The next day I received a thank you email from the SAC Committee Chairperson.  Since the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) is right around the corner, I'll contact them near the middle of March to support the group as they continue developing their professional development plan.   If you would like one of our Training Specialists to speak at an upcoming SAC committee meeting please contact HRD-Professional Development Support at 754-321-5006.




SAC Committee Meeting
iWebPhoto.com - Free Photo Upload, Free Image Hosting, Free Flash Slideshows
Click Photo to Enlarge
iWebPhoto.com

What's In A Grade?


03 February 09 02:31 PM
It’s the end of the school day and the students wait impatiently to receive their report cards.  Derrin hears his name and slowly lumbers up to the teacher to get his report card.  After a quick glance at his grades he  crumbles the piece of paper into a ball and throws it into the trash can as he leaves the room.  For Derrin, the report card isn’t something he looks forward to with delight.    He isn’t motivated by grades and he is not exactly a model student.  Sometimes he participates in his class, but most of the time he doesn’t turn in his homework.   His teacher would say that he is just a lazy student and that’s why his grades are consistently C’s, D’s and a few F’s.  When Derrin’s turned off by school, he works hard to find ways to get suspended.  Samantha, on the other hand, is an “A” student and eagerly dashes up to the teacher to receive her report card.  She opens the paper to review her grades and is relieved to see that even though she struggled to bit on tests, her hard work has been rewarded.  She completes and turns in her homework, and is overall a responsible student.
Grades on Crappy Graphs.com
iWebPhoto.com - Free Photo Upload, Free Image Hosting, Free Flash Slideshows
Click Photo to View
iWebPhoto.com



What’s in a grade, anyway?  What do grades reflect?  Should we place such a heavy emphasis on school grades?  Grades are a reflection of a number of factors.  For Derrin, grades are a constant reminder that he doesn’t fit into the teacher’s classroom.  He falls asleep in class and relies heavily on being a class clown in order to draw attention away from the fact that he is in the 8th grade and can barely spell his name at the top of his paper.  How will the “F” motivate Derrin?   Samantha is a straight “A” student.  Does the “A” indicate that she truly learned the lessons that were taught?  Maybe Samantha is a great test taker, yet barely understands the concepts being tested?  The “A” could also mean that she already knew the information and didn’t need any additional coursework.  Both students’ grades could be a reflection of a few graded assignments or a compilation of several assignments.  

The emphasis on school grades is often discussed and disputed among administrators, teachers, parents and professional developers.   The question I constantly ask:  How do you know the student learned anything in your class based on grades?  How can you prove it?  Samantha may be skating through her K-12 career.  What happens when she goes off to college and for the first time is challenged to prove what she is learning?  What does that say about her formative education?  Are we failing students like Samantha and Derrin? 


Is This The Change We Need?


03 February 09 10:33 AM
Funny how we have embraced this question.  I use it with my clients all of the time.. Sometimes with a very disgruntled response.  This podcast relates to professional developers as well as administrators, teachers, curriculum developers, and the community.  We are way past the days of Prensky's Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants (2001).  It's time for some Digital Wisdom and this podcast speaks volumes.  It's something to consider when planning your school's professional learning for next year. 
Pay Attention

No More Homework!


03 February 09 09:24 AM
Homework.  Love it or leave it, homework is a part of the fabric of our society.  What if there was a way to get teenagers to become fully engaged with homework?  A couple of teachers in Colorado are flipping the script and incorporating technology into their lectures to make homework cool.  Could this technique work for you?

NEVER LECTURE IN CLASS AGAIN
Postedby droberts | 0 Comments    

Big Google


22 January 09 08:08 PM

After four lengthy years, Google has settled a copyright infringement lawsuit with several research libraries, and publishers over the digitization of millions of book collections.  The ramifications are mind boggling.   What will this mean to the future of how we teach children in K-12 schools?  What price will learning organizations have to pay for access to high quality research?  While the education elite debate over what is wrong with public education we may miss the opportunity to engage in a discussion about how to teach within a learning web.   Where do we go from here?  

 

The full text of Google's settlement can be read here: Google Settlement

Postedby droberts | 0 Comments    

Crunch Time for Schoolwide Plans - Triaged, Twisted, and Treasured


22 January 09 04:50 PM
Habit #4 - Hold everyone accountable all of the time.   Okay, I said it.  I said the big "accountability" word.    Nothing ever changes or improves if we do not hold each other accountable - all of the time.  Re-engaging less than weekly allows teams to drift apart and lose focus.  Here are three keys to success for holding accountability meetings (great teams hold these types of meetings):  Triaged,  Twisted, and Treasured. 

Triage Reporting:  My husband was rushed to the emergency room a few months ago with severe stomach pains.  When we arrived, we were met by the Triage Nurse who did a quick prognosis of the severity of his illness.  Since he was not having a heart attack, and did not lose a limb, we had to wait in the emergency room waiting area for several hours until all other more urgent emergencies were treated.  Think about the last time you held a meeting with your team or department.  Did you do triage reporting?  The "wildly" important goals must be addressed NOW.  All other goals and discussions need to be tabled until they can be handled at a later date.  
full staff meeting
iWebPhoto.com - Free Photo Upload, Free Image Hosting, Free Flash Slideshows
Click Photo to Enlarge
iWebPhoto.com
Pictured:  The HRD-Professional Development Support department at one of our Monday morning meetings. 

Twisted:  Keep your lens seriously focused on your "wildly" important goal.   Once your team comes up with their best solutions ask for a third alternative.  Twist the solutions and look for something more.  Always seek the better alternative.  Never settle for less. 

Treasured:  The team is only as good as it's weakest member.  Be willing to ask a team member, "What can I do to help you get the job done?"  Become selfless in your team efforts and always seek to build each other up instead of tear one another down. 

 How could these keys help your team meet it's "wildly" important goals? 


keys
iWebPhoto.com - Free Image Hosting, Free Flash Slideshows
Click Photo to Enlarge
iWebPhoto.com

Crunch Time for Schoolwide Plans – Create Synergy


13 January 09 03:18 PM

Habit #3:  You can’t hold people accountable for results if the only thing that is ever measured are their methods.  What does this mean to you?  It's hard to meet goals unless everyone involved understands what is expected individually from each one of them.  Leadership, remember, is a state of mind.  It can be distributed at every level within a learning organization.   It means that to inspect what you expect, we must get creative and identify new and better behaviors, attitudes, and aspirations for your goals.  

Pictured:  Training Specialist, Lisa Maceinri works with Randy O'Dowd, Inservice Facilitator, on the design of course types for his school's professional development plan.  

 

 

Lisa Maceinri working with an IF
iWebPhoto.com - Free Photo Upload, Free Image Hosting, Free Flash Slideshows
Click Photo to Enlarge
iWebPhoto.com
Postedby droberts | 0 Comments    

Crunch Time for Schoolwide Plans – Keeping Score


12 January 09 01:51 PM
Streetball
iWebPhoto.com - Free Image Hosting, Free Flash Slideshows
Click Photo to Enlarge
iWebPhoto.com
Habit #2:  Keep Scoreboards Visible.  We play differently when no one keeps score. Have you ever watched a street basketball game when the players are not keeping score? There are frequent breaks and no one is really giving it their "A" game. But when they start keeping score things change dramatically.  Players adapt quickly to new challenges, huddle up,  and the pace increases.

In our rush to meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) we do the same thing in our work.   Without a laser focused measure of success, people are unsure what the goal actually is.  Without measures, the same goal is understood by a hundred people in a hundred different ways.  The target is constantly moving depending on the day, week, or month.  With an inconsistent feedback system,  teams and departments veer off track to focus on urgent, but less essential goals. 

In the previous post, we discussed focusing on the "wildly" important.  Once you focus on the "wildly" important, a scoreboard helps to keep everyone focused on the goal.  The goal never wavers or meanders no matter what is mandated at any moment on campus. 

Scoreboard
iWebPhoto.com - Free Photo Upload, Free Image Hosting, Free Flash Slideshows
Click Photo to Enlarge
iWebPhoto.com
Most teams and work groups have no way of knowing how they are doing on their key priorities.  It's not about rewards and consequences, it's about creating a feedback system so players can execute the plays.   The scoreboard needs to be visible, adaptable, and unless you see the score, your strategies and plans are simply abstractions.  What do we have in place to visibly keep the faculty focused on "wildly" important goals?  What formative assessments (feedback system) do we have in place?    If you would like to continue the conversation about how to develop a feedback system for your school, post your question on the discussion board of the PDS-HRD wiki.
More Posts Next page »

This Blog

Tags

No tags have been created or used yet.

Syndication

Sponsored Links

My Friends